Gitea issue templates (.gitea/issue_template/): - bug.yml: structured form requiring version, environment, what-happened, repro steps, expected, optional logs. Routes security reports to security@librete.ch instead of public issues. - feature.yml: prompts for the underlying problem before the proposed solution, plus alternatives and out-of-scope. Pull request template (.gitea/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md): checklist for tests, lint, manual exercise, docs, and changelog. Asks for explicit reviewer notes so trade-offs surface in the PR description rather than being lost in chat. CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: links to Contributor Covenant 2.1 verbatim rather than inlining; documents scope, reporting address (conduct@librete.ch), and points enforcement at the Covenant's own Enforcement Guidelines. README links the docs/ tree, CONTRIBUTING, and the CoC so new contributors find the entry points. Closes #31. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
39 lines
1.1 KiB
YAML
39 lines
1.1 KiB
YAML
name: Feature request
|
|
about: Suggest a new capability or improvement
|
|
labels: ["enhancement"]
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Thanks for proposing a feature. Before opening a request,
|
|
please skim the open issues to see if it already exists.
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: problem
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: What problem does this solve?
|
|
description: |
|
|
Describe the user need first, not the implementation.
|
|
"I can't find old notes when I have hundreds" is more
|
|
useful than "Add full-text search."
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: proposal
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Proposed solution
|
|
description: How would you like it to work?
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: alternatives
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Alternatives considered
|
|
description: What other approaches did you think about, and why are they worse?
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: scope
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Scope
|
|
description: |
|
|
Out of scope is just as useful as in scope. What does
|
|
this proposal NOT include?
|